Which brand of large excavator is best to buy? Analysis and purchasing guide of popular brands across the Internet
Recently, the construction machinery industry has become a hot topic, especially the purchase of large excavators has attracted much attention. This article will combine the hot discussions on the Internet in the past 10 days to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of mainstream excavator brands for you, and provide structured data reference to help you make wise decisions.
1. Top 5 popular excavator brands in 2023
| Ranking | Brand | market share | Average price (10,000 yuan) | Core advantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caterpillar | 22.5% | 150-300 | Powerful and durable |
| 2 | Komatsu | 18.7% | 130-280 | High fuel efficiency and high degree of intelligence |
| 3 | Sany Heavy Industry | 15.3% | 80-180 | High cost performance and perfect after-sales service |
| 4 | XCMG Group | 12.8% | 75-170 | Fast supply of accessories and strong adaptability |
| 5 | Volvo | 9.5% | 140-260 | Comfortable operation and good environmental performance |
2. Comparison of key purchasing indicators
| Brand | Engine power | Bucket capacity (m³) | Maximum excavation depth (m) | Warranty period | Fuel consumption (L/h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caterpillar | 200-450kW | 1.2-2.5 | 7.2-8.5 | 2 years or 5000 hours | 25-40 |
| Komatsu | 180-420kW | 1.1-2.3 | 6.8-8.2 | 3 years or 6000 hours | 20-35 |
| Sany Heavy Industry | 160-380kW | 1.0-2.0 | 6.5-7.8 | 3 years or 5000 hours | 22-38 |
| XCMG Group | 150-360kW | 0.9-1.9 | 6.3-7.5 | 2 years or 4000 hours | 24-42 |
| Volvo | 190-430kW | 1.1-2.2 | 6.9-8.0 | 3 years or 6000 hours | 21-36 |
3. Analysis of brand applicable scenarios
According to recent user feedback and industry expert opinions, excavators of different brands have their own advantages and disadvantages in specific working conditions:
| Applicable scenarios | Recommended brands | Reasons for recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Mining | Caterpillar, Komatsu | Powerful and durable |
| urban construction | Sany Heavy Industry, XCMG | High cost performance and easy maintenance |
| road construction | Volvo, Komatsu | Precise operation and fuel economy |
| Farmland water conservancy | XCMG, Sany Heavy Industry | Adaptable and affordable |
4. User evaluation and after-sales satisfaction
| Brand | User rating (5-point scale) | After-sales service response time | Parts supply satisfaction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caterpillar | 4.6 | Within 24 hours | 90% |
| Komatsu | 4.5 | Within 36 hours | 85% |
| Sany Heavy Industry | 4.3 | Within 12 hours | 95% |
| XCMG Group | 4.2 | Within 18 hours | 92% |
| Volvo | 4.4 | Within 48 hours | 88% |
5. Purchase suggestions
1.Sufficient budget: Give priority to Caterpillar or Volvo, which have better power performance and durability.
2.Pursuing value for money: Sany Heavy Industry and Xugong Group are good choices. The performance of domestic equipment is close to the international level.
3.Focus on fuel economy: Komatsu’s intelligent fuel-saving system has outstanding performance and lower long-term use costs.
4.Special working conditions requirements: Select a targeted model according to the specific construction environment. For example, a reinforced chassis is required for mining operations.
6. Latest industry trends
1. The latest SY750H hybrid excavator launched by Sany Heavy Industry has attracted market attention and has improved fuel efficiency by 30%.
2. Caterpillar announced that it will launch an all-electric large excavator in 2024 in response to environmental protection policy requirements.
3. The 5G remote control system jointly developed by XCMG and Huawei has been put into practical use.
Conclusion:When purchasing a large excavator, you need to comprehensively consider various factors such as budget, working conditions, and after-sales service. It is recommended to inspect the equipment on site, refer to the structured data provided in this article, and make the best choice based on your own needs.
check the details
check the details
en
